Activity Bank

Coach-to-Coach Microteaching Handouts

Handouts for Coach-to-Coach Microteaching

3 handouts plus a facilitator key on the last page, and an optional cover page with the overview and ELE indicators. Prints on US Letter; choose “Fit to page” off and margins “Default.” Print the key separately if the room shouldn't see it.

An instructional coach rehearses a short lesson for two colleagues, who give him feedback.

Professional learning · Coaches, Librarians · 90 minutes

Coach-to-Coach Microteaching

Coaches plan and deliver 10-minute micro-PD sessions on one digital literacy move, get protocol-based peer feedback, and revise before a teacher ever sees it.

Coaches are often asked to teach a skill to adults in the ten minutes at the start of a staff meeting, and those ten minutes rarely get rehearsed. In this session, each coach draws one digital literacy move (tracing a quote, checking an AI answer's sources, a privacy pause before uploading), plans a 10-minute micro-PD with a RISE goal and adult learning principles built in, delivers it to two colleagues, and receives feedback through a structured glow, grow, and try protocol. Coaches also test an AI-drafted set of feedback stems and decide what to keep. Everyone revises and re-delivers the weakest two minutes before leaving.

In this packet

  • Handout A: Move Cards and AI-Drafted Stems (cut-apart cards)
  • Handout B: Micro-PD Planner (worksheet)
  • Handout C: Micro-PD Feedback Rubric (rubric)
  • Facilitator key (last page)

TCEA ELE indicators

  • C4.1 I know how to design and deliver effective professional development sessions.
  • C4.3 I am aware of adult learning principles and how to apply them.
  • C5.3 I am aware of strategies to build trust and promote teamwork.
  • C1.2 I can provide constructive feedback to improve teaching strategies.
  • AI4.2 I can teach others to question and verify AI outputs.

Full facilitator guide: mglearn.github.io/eles/activities/coach-to-coach-microteaching.html

TCEA ELE Activity Bank · Coach-to-Coach Microteaching · CC BY-SA 4.0 · mglearn.github.io/eles

Handout A for Coach-to-Coach Microteaching

Move Cards and AI-Drafted Stems

Cut apart. Each coach draws one Move card. The two AI-Drafted Stems cards are for the whole trio. Backs are the key idea and the common misconception.

Sheet 1 of 2

Move · Trace the quote

Before sharing a quotation from a post, find where the person actually said it and read the sentences around it.

Move · Check the AI's sources

When a chatbot cites a source, open it. Does it exist? Does it say what the chatbot claims?

Move · Who's behind this site?

Leave the page and search the organization's name to learn who runs and funds it before trusting its claims.

Move · Find the original image

Use a reverse image search, or look for the earliest post, to see where and when a photo first appeared.

Move · Check the date

Before reacting to a story, look for when it was published and whether it's being recirculated as new.

Move · The privacy pause

Before uploading anything to an app or AI tool, ask: whose information is in this, and where does it go?

Move · Disclose the AI help

Add a short note to work that AI helped with: which tool, what it did, what you changed and checked.

Move · Name the persuasion

Before sharing, name the technique the post uses: urgency, fear, flattery, bandwagon, or a strong emotion.

TCEA ELE Activity Bank · Coach-to-Coach Microteaching · CC BY-SA 4.0 · mglearn.github.io/eles

Handout A for Coach-to-Coach Microteaching

Move Cards and AI-Drafted Stems

Cut apart. Each coach draws one Move card. The two AI-Drafted Stems cards are for the whole trio. Backs are the key idea and the common misconception.

Sheet 2 of 2

AI-Drafted Stems · Glows

Mock chatbot output: "1. You did an amazing job! 2. Your energy was fantastic and really engaging. 3. The participants practiced the move with a real example, which built their confidence. 4. Great use of technology!"

AI-Drafted Stems · Grows

Mock chatbot output: "1. Consider adding more interactive elements. 2. You seemed nervous; work on your confidence. 3. The model could show a dead end as well as a success, so participants see what checking really looks like. 4. Next time, include a clear link to what students will do."

TCEA ELE Activity Bank · Coach-to-Coach Microteaching · CC BY-SA 4.0 · mglearn.github.io/eles

Handout B for Coach-to-Coach Microteaching

Micro-PD Planner

NameDate

Ten minutes total. Name the adult learning principle each segment honors: why before what, use experience, real problems, choice, relevance now, practice with feedback.

  1. My move and the teachers I'd teach it to:

  2. RISE goal for this micro-PD. Relevant (why these teachers, why now) · Impactful (what changes for students) · Specific (what teachers will be able to do) · Energized (why they'll want to try it):

  3. Why (1 min): the problem teachers will recognize. Principle honored:

  4. Model (3 min): my think-aloud, including one dead end. The example I'll use:

  5. Try (4 min): what participants do, on what example, and how I'll know they did it:

  6. Transfer (2 min): what teachers do with students next week and the student evidence they bring back:

  7. Revision after feedback: the segment I changed, what I changed, and which feedback prompted it:

TCEA ELE Activity Bank · Coach-to-Coach Microteaching · CC BY-SA 4.0 · mglearn.github.io/eles

Handout C for Coach-to-Coach Microteaching

Micro-PD Feedback Rubric

NameDate

Score quietly after each session. Circle one level per row and write the moment that shows it in the margin.

CriterionNot yetEmergingSolidReady for teachers
Why before whatStarts with a definition or a tool.Names a problem, but it's generic.Opens with a problem these teachers recognize.Opens with a problem these teachers recognize, and connects it to their students in under a minute.
Live modelDescribes the move instead of doing it.Does the move, but silently or too fast to follow.Thinks aloud through the move on a real example.Thinks aloud, including a dead end, so the checking looks real.
Participants practiceParticipants only watch.Participants practice for under two minutes.Participants do the move on a real example for about four minutes.Participants do the move and the presenter checks that each person did it.
Transfer to studentsNo mention of students.Suggests students could try it someday.Names what students will do next week.Names what students will do and the student evidence teachers will bring back.
Respect for adult learnersTalks down to participants or ignores their experience.Acknowledges experience but doesn't use it.Invites participants' experience or a choice at one point.Uses participants' experience and offers a real choice within the ten minutes.
TCEA ELE Activity Bank · Coach-to-Coach Microteaching · CC BY-SA 4.0 · mglearn.github.io/eles

Facilitator only for Coach-to-Coach Microteaching

Answer key and notes

Handout A: Move Cards and AI-Drafted Stems

Move · Trace the quote
Why it matters: quotations are often clipped to reverse their meaning. Misconception: "If there's a name attached, it's real."
Move · Check the AI's sources
Why it matters: chatbots can produce plausible citations that don't exist or don't support the claim. Misconception: "It gave a source, so it's checked."
Move · Who's behind this site?
Why it matters: a professional look and a .org address tell you nothing about bias. Misconception: "I'll read the About page."
Move · Find the original image
Why it matters: real photos are often reshared with false context. Misconception: "I can tell by looking whether it's edited."
Move · Check the date
Why it matters: old stories resurface as breaking news. Misconception: "If it's in my feed today, it happened today."
Move · The privacy pause
Why it matters: student names and work end up in tools that keep or train on them. Misconception: "It's a school device, so it's safe."
Move · Disclose the AI help
Why it matters: disclosure builds trust and makes the student's own thinking visible. Misconception: "Disclosure means admitting you cheated."
Move · Name the persuasion
Why it matters: naming the technique slows the share. Misconception: "Only other people fall for that."
AI-Drafted Stems · Glows
Keep 3 (it names a rubric criterion). Revise 2 to cite a moment. Cut 1 and 4: generic praise, and 4 counts tool use as quality.
AI-Drafted Stems · Grows
Keep 3 and 4 (specific, tied to the rubric). Revise 1 to name which segment. Cut 2: it evaluates the person, not the session.