Activity Bank
A middle school team pitches its redesigned slides, sketched on index cards, to classmates.

All activities Student learning

Presentation Makeover

Teams rescue a cluttered slide deck, making it clear, accessible, honestly sourced, and upfront about AI images, then pitch the revised version in 60 seconds.

Print handouts

Overview

Most students have sat through a slide deck with tiny yellow text, a paragraph per slide, a mystery statistic, and a photo pulled from somewhere. In this activity, teams get a printed "before" deck made by fictional students and give it a full makeover: one idea per slide, readable fonts and contrast, alt text for images, credit for every image and fact, and a clear note on any AI-generated image. Then each team presents the revised version in 60 seconds. The point is that a presentation is communication, and honest, accessible design is part of communicating well.

Objectives

  • Students will identify at least eight clarity, accessibility, and sourcing problems in a mock slide deck and explain why each one matters to an audience.
  • Students will redesign slides using one idea per slide, readable fonts, strong contrast, and descriptive alt text.
  • Students will credit every image and factual claim, remove or replace unsupported statistics, and disclose AI-generated images with a clear label.
  • Students will present a 60-second revised version and explain one design choice they made for their audience.

Materials

On paper

  • Handout A: The "Before" Deck (1 per team; print in color if you can, so the contrast problems show)
  • Handout B: Makeover Checklist (1 per team)
  • Handout C: 60-Second Pitch Rubric (1 per team, plus one for peer feedback)
  • Blank paper or index cards for sketching new slides (6 per team), markers, sticky notes

On screen

  • One device per team with any presentation or slide app your school supports
  • The app's built-in accessibility checker, if it has one
  • Optional: an AI image generator your district approves, used by the teacher on a projector to show what a disclosure label looks like

Before you start

  1. Print Handout A. If you run the digital path, rebuild the six slides in your slide app exactly as described (tiny text, yellow on white, crowded bullets) and share a copy with each team.
  2. Decide on a format for credit lines and AI disclosures your class will use all year, for example "Image: title, creator, license or source" and "Image created with an AI tool; prompt written by our team."
  3. Set up a timer visible to the room for the 60-second pitches.

Step by step

  1. 10–5 min

    Hook

    Five seconds per slide

    Project or hold up Slide 2 of Handout A for five seconds only, then hide it. Ask: "What was the main point?" Most students can't say. Then ask: "What got in the way?" Collect answers: too many words, can't read the color, too small. Say: "Today you're a design team. Your client made this deck. Your job is to make it work for every person in the audience, and to make it honest."

    Facilitator noteKeep the fictional authors off the hook: the goal is to fix the slides, not mock the people who made them.

  2. 25–15 min

    Explore

    Audit the "before" deck

    Teams read Handout A and use Handout B to mark every problem they find, slide by slide. They sort each problem into one of four lenses: Clarity (one idea, fewer words), Access (contrast, font size, alt text, color alone carrying meaning), Honesty (sources for facts, credit for images), and AI (disclosing AI-generated images). Teams aim to find at least eight problems.

    Facilitator noteStudents often miss the color-coded chart on Slide 4. If the only difference between the bars is red versus green, some viewers can't tell them apart. Labels fix it.

  3. 315–21 min

    Model

    Think aloud: fixing Slide 3

    Model a makeover of Slide 3 (the garden statistic) out loud. "The claim is 'Gardens make students 50% happier!' Source: 'the internet.' I can't trace that, so I can't keep it as a fact. I have three honest options: find a reliable source and cite it, change it to our own evidence ('In our survey of 42 classmates, 30 said they'd join a garden club'), or cut it. Now the image: it's AI-generated, so I add a small label: 'Image created with an AI tool.' Then alt text: 'Raised garden beds with tomato plants beside a school building.' I describe what matters, not every pixel."

    Facilitator notePoint out that the survey numbers in your model are part of the fictional deck. Students should use only evidence they can actually trace or collect.

  4. 421–37 min

    Create

    Make it over

    Teams rebuild the deck, either sketching new slides on paper or editing the shared copy in a slide app. Required: a clear title slide with the team's names, no more than one main idea per slide, readable font size and strong contrast, alt text written for every image, a credit line for every image and fact, a disclosure label on every AI-generated image, and a final Sources slide. Teams may cut slides; fewer is often better. They use Handout B as a final check before they present.

    Facilitator noteCirculate and ask, "Who is this slide for? Could someone in the back row read it? Could someone using a screen reader understand the image?"

  5. 537–49 min

    Practice

    60-second pitches

    Each team presents its revised deck in 60 seconds. After each pitch, one listener team scores it with Handout C and gives one "glow" and one "grow." Presenters end by naming one design choice they made for their audience, for example: "We moved the details into speaker notes so the slide has just one sentence."

    Facilitator noteWith many teams, run pitches in parallel pods of three teams so everyone presents and everyone gives feedback.

  6. 649–55 min

    Reflect

    What changed and why

    Each student writes on an exit slip: "The change that helped the audience most was… The change that made the deck more honest was… One thing I'll do differently on my next project is…" Ask two or three volunteers to share.

    Facilitator noteLook for specific reasons ("yellow text failed contrast"), not just "it looks better."

Paper or screen

Unplugged

The whole makeover works on paper. Teams sketch each revised slide on a half sheet or index card, write the alt text and credit line on the back, and add a small "AI" disclosure label with a sticky note. Pitches happen with the sketched cards held up or taped to the board. Contrast can be tested by holding the printed deck at arm's length or photocopying it in grayscale: if you can't read it, the contrast is too low.

Digital

Each team edits a shared copy of the deck in a slide app. They use the app's alt text field on each image, run any built-in accessibility checker, and test the deck in presenter view from across the room. Speaker notes hold the details that were cut from the slides. If you demonstrate AI image generation, the teacher runs an approved tool on the projector and models adding a visible disclosure label; students don't need accounts.

Does it need a screen? A slide app's alt text field and accessibility checker give instant, specific feedback on problems students can't easily see on paper, such as reading order and missing descriptions. The paper path is just as strong for clarity and honesty, and often faster for the first redesign.

Evidence of learning

What you should be able to see or collect if it worked.

  • Handout B shows at least eight problems sorted across all four lenses, including the chart that depends on color alone.
  • Every image in the revised deck has descriptive alt text and a credit line, and every AI-generated image carries a visible disclosure label.
  • The unsourced statistic is sourced, replaced with evidence the team can trace, or cut, and the team can explain which option they chose and why.
  • Presenters name at least one design choice and the audience it serves.

Adaptations

Grades 6–7
Reduce the deck to four slides and focus on three fixes: one idea per slide, alt text, and credit lines. Provide sentence starters for alt text: "A photo of… showing…"
Grades 11–12
Add a slide with a complex chart and have teams redesign it for accuracy (labeled axes, a source, a baseline that doesn't exaggerate), then write a speaker-notes script.
Emergent bilinguals
Let teams pitch in pairs with one speaker and one pointer, and allow a bilingual title slide. Pre-teach contrast, credit, alt text, and disclose with visuals.
Students with IEPs or 504 plans
Offer a partially redesigned deck as a starting point and let students present by recording audio or pointing to slides while a partner reads.

Standards connections

Students revise a slide deck for clarity, accessibility, credit, and AI disclosure and present it, connecting ELAR composition with the ethics and creativity strands of Technology Applications.

TEKS
ethics and laws (c)(9)compositioncreativity and innovationTEKS sections: Technology Applications §126.17–§126.19, high school Technology Applications courses (19 TAC Chapter 126); ELAR §110.22–§110.24, §110.36–§110.39

See how all activities align

Reflect

  • How clearly did I communicate my ideas, and what did I change so everyone in the audience could follow them? (Student ELE S3.2)
  • When is it right to use an AI-generated image in a presentation, and how do I make sure the audience knows?
  • What makes a fact on a slide trustworthy enough to keep?

What comes next

Students apply the Makeover Checklist to their next class presentation before they present it and attach the completed checklist as part of the project. At home, they can offer to review a family member's slide deck or flyer using the same four lenses.

Pairs well with