All activities Student learning
Students check influencer clips, supplement ads, forum posts, and a chatbot answer about wellness by reading laterally, then decide when a question belongs with a trusted adult or clinician.
Teens meet health and wellness claims everywhere: a fitness influencer's morning routine, a sponsored supplement ad, a forum thread at 1 a.m., a chatbot that answers any question in a confident paragraph. In this activity, teams sort eight clearly fictional health posts by who is behind them, what they want, and what better sources say, using lateral reading instead of gut feeling. The goal is not to decide what is medically true. It is to build a repeatable habit for checking health information and to know when the right next step is a person, not another search.
Hook
Read Card 1 aloud (the "Glow Reset" tea influencer). Ask: "Would you try it, skip it, or want to know more first?" Students vote with a hand signal. Then ask: "What made you lean that way: the person, the before-and-after, the comments?" List a few reasons on the board without judging them. Say: "Health posts are designed to feel personal and urgent. Today you'll learn the checking moves that work even when a post feels convincing."
Facilitator noteMake it clear up front: every person, product, and site on the cards is invented. We are practicing moves, not reviewing real products.
Explore
Teams draw Cards 2–5 and may use only what is on the card. For each, they log on Handout B: What is the claim? Who is behind it? What do they want me to do (buy, share, stop, worry)? Verdict: Trust, Doubt, or Ask a Pro, with a confidence score from 1–5.
Facilitator noteListen for "she's a nurse, so it's true" or "it has lots of five-star reviews." Those are the vertical-reading habits you'll revisit.
Model
Model on Card 3 (the supplement ad). Narrate three moves out loud: 1. Who's behind it? Search the brand or person's name plus words like "sponsored" or "who owns." 2. What do better sources say? Search the claim itself and look for hospitals, university health centers, public health agencies, or medical organizations that explain the topic, with a named reviewer and a date. 3. Is this a question for a person? If the post asks you to change what you eat, take, or skip for your own body, the next step is a trusted adult or clinician. Point out what you do not do: trust the testimonials, the lab coat, or the number of followers.
Facilitator noteUnplugged: read the "Other sources" slip aloud as though it were your search results. The move of leaving the post to check elsewhere is the same.
Practice
Teams re-check Cards 2–5 and take on Cards 6–8, with roles rotating each card: Searcher (drives the device or asks for the slip), Skeptic (asks "who profits?"), Scribe (logs moves on Handout B). Card 7 is a mock AI chatbot answer. Teams must pull out each factual claim in it and mark which ones they could trace to a reliable source and which they could not.
Facilitator noteMost teams find the chatbot answer is calm and partly sensible, with one invented statistic and a made-up "study." The lesson: an AI answer has no author to investigate, so tracing claims is the only check, and a chatbot is not a clinician.
Debrief
Compare Round 1 and Round 2 confidence scores. Ask: "Which cards flipped? Which move flipped them?" Then sort the cards on the board into three columns: Trust the source, Doubt it, Take it to a person. Ask: "Why does Card 8 (the forum post about stopping a prescription) go in the last column even if the poster means well?" Build a class list: Signs a health post needs a second look: selling something, miracle or guaranteed results, a short timeline, fake or vague credentials, "doctors don't want you to know," no date or reviewer, and advice to stop or start something on your own.
Facilitator noteIf you project an approved chatbot, ask it a general wellness question and have students spot whether it tells them to see a clinician, cites sources, or states numbers without a trace. Don't enter any personal health details.
Apply
Each student completes Handout C: two go-to kinds of reliable sources, the three questions they'll ask of any health post, and the trusted people they could take a question to (a family member, school nurse, counselor, doctor or clinic). Name your school nurse and counselor and how to reach them.
Facilitator noteHandout C stays private. Students write roles or initials, not personal health details.
Reflect
On a sticky note, students finish: "The next time a health post makes me want to buy, stop, or worry, I will first…" Collect them as you would an exit ticket.
Facilitator noteLook for a named move (search the source, find better coverage, trace the claim) or a named person, not "be careful."
Run both rounds on paper. The card backs include an "Other sources" note describing what a lateral search would turn up. When a team asks "what do other sources say?", hand them that slip. Asking for the slip is the visible habit you want. Model the chatbot card by reading it aloud as a printed AI answer, and have teams underline each claim before you hand them the trace slip.
Give each team one device for Round 2 only, so Round 1 stays a pure read of the post itself. Teams search the fictional names and discover they return nothing, then search the claim to find reliable health organizations explaining the topic. In an LMS, post the cards as a slide deck and have scribes fill Handout B as a shared table. Only the teacher runs any AI chatbot, on the projector, with no personal information entered.
Does it need a screen? Live searching shows students how quickly a lateral check turns up a sponsor, a missing credential, or a better explanation from a medical organization, and how a chatbot answer can sound right while inventing a number. That speed and contrast is the evidence of learning paper can only describe.
What you should be able to see or collect if it worked.
Students read health posts and a chatbot answer laterally to judge sources, purpose, and claims, the inquiry and author's-purpose work in ELAR plus online safety in digital citizenship.
In the next lesson, students bring one health or wellness claim they have seen (without personal details) and run it through the three questions for a partner. At home, they can share the class list of "signs a health post needs a second look" with a family member.
