W. W. Jacobs (1902) · public-domain short story · grades 7–10 · ~1 week / two meetings. Rights: Public domain.
Kit section 5 (group agreement & calendar) filled in for one text — a finished plan students see before writing their own. Tinted italic = sample answers.
| Text / author / edition | “The Monkey’s Paw” — W. W. Jacobs (1902). Public-domain short story. |
|---|---|
| Group / period / dates | Dev’s group · Period __ · Meetings ___ & ___ |
| Grade / TEKS target (p. 3) | Grade 7 · §110.23 — 7(A): theme through characters/events; 6(C,D): support inferences; 1(D): student-led discussion. |
| Learning intention | We are learning to explain how the family’s wishes and the story’s structure reveal a theme about fate and greed. |
| Success criteria | I bring one open question, cite two details with locations, respond to a peer, and name how my thinking changed. |
| Chunk | Read through | Meeting date · leader |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The paw arrives, Morris’s warning, and the first wish. | Tue · Leader: Dev |
| 2 | The consequence (Herbert’s death) and the final two wishes. | Thu · Leader: Nora |
| Member | First job | Rotates to (next meeting) |
|---|---|---|
| Dev | Questioner | Summarizer |
| Nora | Summarizer | Clarifier |
| Theo | Clarifier | Evidence tracker |
| Ivy | Predictor | Questioner |
Name: Theo · Home group: Dev’s group · Period __ · Meetings ___ & ___ · Section: “The Monkey’s Paw,” Chunk 2 · Expert lens: Plot
Was the third wish the right choice?
Could any wish have ended well?
1. The paw grants three wishes, but each carries a cost.
2. The wished-for money arrives as compensation for Herbert’s death.
3. The parents wish him back, then wish him gone again.
fakir = a holy man.
talisman = an object believed to hold power.
1. Morris throws the paw on the fire (early). → Warns that the wishes are dangerous.
2. The knocking stops after the third wish (ending). → Shows the cost of undoing fate.
A family gains a cursed wishing paw; their wishes bring money through their son’s death, and they undo the horror with the last wish.
My interpretation: Meddling with fate for gain brings ruin, not reward.
Synthesis (two lenses): The three-wish structure (plot) enacts the theme: each wish shows that forcing fate exacts a price. Text points: the first wish (Chunk 1) and the last (Chunk 2).
After discussion: My thinking became clearer once the group compared evidence.
TEKS evidence: 6(C,D) supported inference; 7(A) theme through characters/events; 1(D) response to a peer. · Pair with the PlotPoint “The Monkey’s Paw” room.