Use this quick rubric to compare district assessment systems. Score each platform from zero to four, check the non-negotiables, and add options to a side-by-side table.
A vendor can score well and still be a poor choice if these are missing. Treat unchecked items as follow-up questions before award.
Scale: zero = not documented, one = weak, two = adequate, three = strong, four = proven with district references.
| Criterion | What to look for | Weight | Score |
|---|
Complete the rubric to estimate fit.
Needs review85–100 finalist70–84 viable55–69 risky0–54 weak fit
Use this score for shortlisting. Final award should still include reference checks, security review, accessibility review, contract terms, and total cost.
| Vendor | Score | Gate status | Top risk | Notes | Remove |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No vendors added yet. | |||||