Answer Key: Classifying Matter by Its Properties
How to use this key
Answers are grouped by section and question number. Many items are open-ended; accept any response that shows correct reasoning even if the wording differs. Notes flag where more than one answer is defensible and list common misconceptions to watch for. Estimated grading time: ~5–7 min per packet.
Sample "identities" behind Table 1 (for your reference)
Students are not asked to name the exact substances — only to classify and justify. The data were built from these plausible identities so the properties are internally consistent: W ≈ iron/steel (magnetic metal), X ≈ quartz/sand (nonmetal), Y ≈ copper (metal), Z ≈ a salt or sugar (soluble nonmetal), Q ≈ aluminum (metal). Do not require these names from students.
Start Notice & Wonder grade for effort · ~2 min
1 Sorting a penny, eraser, marble, and paper clip.
2 Two properties to sort coins, buttons, and beads.
Build Read the Science ~1 min
3 How Figure 1 shows the mixture vs. the pure substance.
Apply Use the Data ~2–3 min
4 Classify each sample M (metal) or N (nonmetal).
X — N (dull, does not conduct).
Y — M (shiny, conducts).
Z — N (dull, does not conduct).
Q — M (shiny, conducts).
Property relied on most: most students should cite conductivity and/or luster as the deciding metal/nonmetal properties. Accept either, or both together. (Magnetism alone is not a good metal test — only W is magnetic even though Y and Q are also metals; watch for students who over-rely on it — see Q6 and misconceptions.)
5 Which property tells X from Z?
6 Observation (O) vs. Inference (I).
b) O — a directly observed result (the magnet sticks).
c) I — a reasoned conclusion about identity ("probably iron or steel because…").
d) I — a reasoned conclusion ("is not a metal because…").
Observation = measured/seen directly; inference = a conclusion reasoned from evidence. Any "probably…" or "because…" identity statement is an inference.
7 Which test tells W from Y (both shiny, conducting metals)?
8 Pure substance or mixture? (ground-up Z with varied specks + magnetic grains)
Explain CER (Q9) ~1–2 min
9 Are W and Q "the same metal"? Do the data support the claim?
Defensible note: Any two of the differing properties (density, magnetism) earn full evidence credit. A student who claims they are the same should lose credit, because the data clearly differ — but if they only cite the shared "shiny + conducts" properties, use this as a teaching moment that those are shared by many metals and do not prove identity.
CER scoring rubric (3 points)
| Score | Claim | Evidence | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Clear, correct claim ("data do not support"). | Two accurate, relevant properties from Table 1 that differ (e.g., density, magnetism). | Correctly links evidence to the idea that a pure substance has the same properties throughout. |
| 2 | Claim stated, mostly clear. | One solid differing property, or two with a minor error. | Some correct linkage but incomplete or a small misconception. |
| 1 | Vague or partly correct claim. | Evidence weak, off-topic, or cites only shared properties. | Little or flawed reasoning; "same properties throughout" idea missing. |
| 0 | No/incorrect claim. | No evidence. | No reasoning. |
Close ACE ~1 min
ACE Articulate / Connect / Extend.
Connect: the cited row must actually match the chosen property (e.g., density → any row's g/cm³ value; magnetism → Sample W is "Yes"; solubility → Sample Z is "Yes"; conductivity/luster → W, Y, or Q).
Extend: any correct everyday use of that property (e.g., a magnet sorting steel cans at a recycling center; noticing sugar dissolves in tea but sand does not; a heavy object for its size sinking). More than one answer is defensible.
Watch Common misconceptions
- Mixture vs. compound. A mixture is only physically blended, so its parts keep their own properties and can be separated by a property (magnet, dissolving, filtering). A compound is chemically joined and cannot be separated that way. Q8's ground-up Z is a mixture, not a compound.
- A property is not the substance. "Shiny" or "conducts" does not by itself name a substance — W, Y, and Q are all shiny conductors yet are different metals (Q7, Q9). You must check several properties together.
- Size vs. density. Density does not depend on how big the piece is — a small and a large chunk of the same substance have the same density. Students may wrongly think a bigger sample is "denser."
- Magnetism = metal. Only some metals are magnetic. Y and Q are metals but not magnetic; a non-magnetic result does not mean "not a metal" (Q4).
- Observation vs. inference (Q6). Students often mark a reasoned identity ("probably iron") as an "observation." Any "probably…" or "because…" statement is usually an inference.
Teacher follow-up based on likely errors
If many students miss Q6c/Q6d, do a 5-minute sort of statements into "measured/seen" vs. "concluded." If Q4 shows students leaning on magnetism to decide metal/nonmetal, re-anchor with the fact that Y and Q are non-magnetic metals. If Q8 answers say "compound," clarify mixture vs. compound. If CER (Q9) evidence is thin, model citing a specific Table 1 value aloud. The "a property is not the substance" idea is the highest-value item to address next class.