AI for the Defense / Resources
Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association · July 2026

How this site came to be

A candid note on building this site with AI assistance

In keeping with a session about using AI responsibly, here is an honest account of how the site itself was made. It was built over about two days of focused work by Miguel Guhlin working with Claude, an AI assistant. A person directed every decision: what to build, which quotes to use, and what is appropriate for a criminal defense audience. The figures below are rough estimates, offered in the same spirit of candor the session asks of any AI-assisted work.

Three figures

Estimated, not measured. The ranges matter more than the numbers.

Whose timeEstimateWhat it covers
AI assistant, active working time ~4–7 hours Aggregate generation and tool work: writing the code and content, web research, image processing, rendering pages to check them, and deploying, spread thin across two days.
Facilitator’s time ~5–9 hours Writing the requests, reviewing deployed pages and screenshots, making the judgment calls (which quote, which layout, what fits a TCDLA audience), and catching issues.
Equivalent human build, from scratch ~250–400 hours Roughly six to ten weeks for one skilled generalist, or about three to four weeks for a small team working in parallel.

Why the human estimate is that large

The same work, broken down by workstream for one skilled person.

WorkstreamEstimated effort
Design system, brand, and two CSS frameworks (pages and decks)3–5 days
Deck framework: presenter view with cross-window sync, keyboard navigation, print/PDF export, exit icon4–6 days
Four slide decks: layout, copy, speaker notes, images5–7 days
Eight activity pages, including the interactive fluency self-assessment with scoring, a color chart, and PDF export, the ethics randomizer, and a fifty-scenario bank7–10 days
Hub, About, Presentations, Walkthrough, Quotes, and three handouts4–5 days
Translating all interface text into seven languages (Spanish, Vietnamese, Arabic, Hindi, Urdu, Chinese), including right-to-left support5–10 days
Content writing: defense-appropriate copy, ethics scenarios, and the prompt library4–6 days
Image production: generation, cropping infographics, and optimizing thirty-plus assets2–3 days
Quote research, verbatim verification, and sourcing (sixteen quotes)1–2 days
Testing, revisions, and deployment2–3 days

That lands around forty to fifty-five working days for one person doing all of it; longer once you add coordination, or compressed with a team.

The takeaway

Roughly 250 to 400 hours of conventional human effort, delivered against about five to nine hours of a person’s time over two days, a rough thirty to fifty times leverage on human attention.

The honest caveats matter. The person still supplied all of the judgment: which quotes, which framing, what is appropriate for a defense audience. The translations are machine quality, where a human project would pay for professional review. And much of the time saved is grunt work (translating seven times over, optimizing images, renumbering slides, checking links) that compresses especially well, while the parts that need a real lawyer’s eye still rest with a human.

These figures are estimates for illustration. The point is transparency about how AI-assisted work actually comes together, not precision to the hour.